Many contemporary scholars have broken the Cubist movement down into two discrete periods. This would draw the eye of the viewer to specific portions and hopefully, influence his or her impression of the painting as a whole. In order to achieve more depth, many artists such as Picasso would paint these cubes and shapes from multiple perspectives.
#PABLO PICASSO CUBISM SERIES#
This was done by breaking a picture down into its geometric components almost as if reducing its essence to a series of lines and angles.
To put this another way, they hoped to literally embrace the two-dimensional aspect of the canvas. "The Cubist painters rejected the inherited concept that art should copy nature, or that they should adopt the traditional techniques of perspective, modelling, and foreshortening." As Sabine Rewald from the Metropolitan Museum of Art explains (1): It can be argued that Cubism was a direct response to the rather traditionalist styles associated with the latter half of the 19th century (and in particular, some of the works associated with Victorian painters). Nearly any geometric angle could be employed to achieve the desired result. However, we need to make a point to emphasise that cubes were only a portion of this concept. Let us begin by examining the specific techniques behind Cubism as a whole before moving on.Ĭubism Defined: Redefining Art in Relation to NatureĪs the name hints, Cubism involves the use of geometric shapes and patterns to represent a specific form. We will address both of these concepts while also examining a handful of other styles that are directly linked to this unique style of art. In order to appreciate this influence, it is important to examine the principles behind Cubism as well as the relationship between this movement and Picasso himself. Primarily developed and espoused by Pablo Picasso, this style has had an impact upon artists for well over a century.
0 kommentar(er)
